<TITLE>06. Par 19-22</TITLE>L-19 In our picture when He had taken these three witnesses to go up to testify of something... Now, perhaps maybe I'm going to take it in a little different angle. It really represented the coming of Christ the second time on the appearing of Moses and Elijah and then Christ only. But it represents something more.
And every time you read the Word of God, men who read this same chapter two thousand years ago was inspired by it. Men who read it five hundred years ago was inspired by it, just as inspiring as it is to us tonight because it is the Word of God.
If I'd write you a letter it might inspire you. But it wouldn't never help the rest of the world. And after while the inspiration would leave the letter as you'd go on. But God's Word is eternally or from everlasting when it comes to Everlasting. That's the reason I believe the Word. So now, He was going to make a manifestation to show to the world what He had did.

L-20 Now, to the theologians and the Sunday school teachers, students of the Scripture, in the Old Testament we find out that when a son was born into a home, but if he become automatically an heir because he was born in the home.
Now, many times in watching the translation of the Bible like the King James, Saint John 14, He said, "In My Father's house is many mansions." That doesn't sound right does it? "In My Father's house is mansions in a house."
I don't know; I believe it wasn't Weymouth; it might've been Moffatt, or one of the translators said, "In My Father's apartment house is many apartments." That's worse than ever. But in the original it's this: "In My Father's Kingdom is many palaces."

L-21 Now, why was it? Even down in the days of the early translators in England, when King James Version, when the translators translated the Bible for King James... And a kingdom was called a house. And he was the father of that kingdom. And that's the way the translators put it to the view of the English people in that day. "In My Father's Kingdom is palaces," it was called.
Now, in the Old Testament when a child was born and this is good medicine for you Pentecostals.
Notice, when a child was born automatically he became a son because he was born. A son is "one begotten of." That's where you Catholic people...?... on eternal sonship. How can you explain that word? How can He be eternal and yet be a son? A son has a beginning. All right.

L-22 But in this day when a son was borned into a home, then he was a son because he was born. Now, many of the Pentecostals, and the Baptists, and Presbyterians, or Nazarenes, they take that as sufficient; that settles it. But it's wrong according to the Word.
Now, this son being born, he was given a tutor. Paul speaks of it in Galatians, and so forth of how a tutor was a raiser or a teacher that was to teach the son. And the father, being his son, he got the very best tutor, teacher that he could find. A man that would raise the child, not according to the things of common ethics of teaching. But to be an obedient child, somebody that the father had confidence in.


<A HREF="P7">Next Page</A>